From The Franklin Press, May 2, 2014:

It’s time for an update on all of the great work being done by the Land Trust for the Little Tennessee (LTLT) and its partners over the last few months. Much headway has been made toward developing the Southern Appalachian Stream Visual Assessment Protocol (saSVAP) to be used for volunteer stream monitoring in the Little Tennessee River Basin, which includes the Nantahala, Cheoah, and Tuckasegee rivers. The saSVAP is a simple tool that allows citizens without formal training in stream ecology to assess various aspects of stream health in their own backyards.

The LTLT has recently rebranded the protocol under the moniker Grade Your Stream. It is being integrated with the LTLT’s related Shade Your Stream program. A Grade Your Stream website is under development, which means participants will easily be able to input the results of their surveys with a few simple mouse clicks, said Jason Meador, Citizen Science Program Manager of the LTLT.

The development of Grade Your Stream and its affiliated up-and-coming website will make it easier than ever for citizens to share valuable information with researchers and others interested in monitoring watershed health in the region.

Another area of progress has been the research and synthesis of program implementation recommendations for the Grade Your Stream program by the University of Georgia 2013 Integrative Conservation (ICON) PhD program cohort. If you read one of our February columns you may remember that the LTLT and ICON students are developing a rollout plan to: (1) guide the LTLT in their expanded application of the saSVAP from its prior use solely within the Little Tennessee watershed as part of the LTLT’s biomonitoring program to its broader use by landowners and other citizens in the Little Tennessee River Basin; (2) explore ways to train citizens who will use saSVAP within both watersheds; and (3) learn lessons from saSVAP data collection within the Little Tennessee River Basin database. After meeting with Jason Meador and others at the Coweeta Hydrologic Lab in March, and implementing a prototypical Grade Your Stream survey, the ICON students began drafting a program planning guide that would assess these program elements.

On April 21, the ICON cohort delivered a draft copy of the Grade Your Stream Program Planning Guide to Meador, a nearly 90-page report outlining general information and specific recommendations for implementing the program.

The multidisciplinary team of 11 PhD students addressed how to make the protocol more relevant to volunteers and the community, how to make the survey instruments more simple and streamlined, and how to best promote and maintain long-term viability of the program. On April 28, ICON students returned to Franklin to debrief with Meador and other leaders of the Grade Your Stream, and discussed revisions to the document and next steps for the program. The ICON students have learned a lot from this experience, and are now using the experience with the LTLT to write a scholarly article about how conservation groups can contribute to community stewardship of watersheds. Though there is still a lot to be done, we are excited about the momentum gained in just a few short months and look forward to checking in with readers to report on our progress later this summer!

This column is produced by members of the Coweeta Listening Project (CLP), a branch of the Coweeta Long Term Ecological Research Program. Conact [email protected] or Coweeta Listening Project, UGA, 210 Field St., Room 204, Athens, GA 30602

 

From The Franklin Press, April 18, 2014:

How do you know if a stream isn’t healthy? Do you take its temperature? Check to see if it’s in pain? Or do you simply notice that something isn’t right? Unusual stream flows can indicate a stream is unhealthy. If a stream is not flowing normally, that usually indicates it is unhealthy. Maybe the water is gushing faster than usual. Perhaps where there were once schools of fish there are now none. Changes like this would most likely be evident to anyone who spent a lot of time with the stream. But what if the stream change took place over decades instead of days?

In our last column we learned that what makes a beautiful stream can be different depending on the point of view. For example, a beautiful stream for a fish may not be very attractive to a human. Could the same be true for stream health? Let’s compare a stream to a car for a moment. Most people would probably agree a healthy car would run smoothly. There would be no black smoke spewing out of the tailpipe, no funny noises as it drove down the highway. It would be functioning well. And if the driver had to swerve suddenly around debris, it would be able to return quickly to its position on the road. Healthy streams can be thought of in a similar way.

A healthy stream is a functioning stream. Although the purposes of a stream vary depending on the region, for a majority of streams in the Southern Appalachians a healthy stream means providing habitat for fish and other aquatic animals, moving fresh water from the mountains to the valleys, and carrying nutrient rich sediment to downstream areas. Another way a healthy stream can be identified is by seeing how long it takes the stream to recover after a flood or drought. A healthy stream that is well connected to the entire river system and protected from excessive erosion will be able to return to its normal state much faster than an unhealthy stream.

An unhealthy stream looks different. Although it is relatively easy to notice if a stream changes suddenly, some streams have been unhealthy for so long that no one is really sure what the natural state is. Luckily, there are a set of characteristics that generally define a healthy stream.
A short visual assessment survey specific to southern Appalachian streams (saSVAP) was developed to allow those of us who aren’t stream scientists to determine whether a stream is healthy. The Land Trust for the Little Tennessee (LTLT) has adopted saSVAP and given it a new name: Grade Your Stream. The survey calls for evaluating stream traits, such as the number of bends and pools present within the stream. Both of these are important to consider because fish need pools to survive and the bends in a stream help slow down water flow and reduce erosion.

Another trait examined in this survey is livestock access. Although manure may seem harmless because it’s biodegradable, it’s not normally found in a stream and can upset the natural balance by adding more fertilizer-like substances to the water. When more fertilizer is available, other plants or animals, which are not normally present are sometimes able to take advantage of the new source of food. For example, a clear, fast flowing stream could become clogged with algae as fertilizing products are added, making it difficult for other living things to survive.

In addition to livestock, vegetation along the stream bank is also assessed. A diverse assortment of grasses, shrubs and trees along the stream bank provide a range of services to the stream, most importantly an extensive below ground root system that prevents bank erosion. Larger shrubs and trees have the added bonus of providing shade to the stream. A shaded stream is more likely to provide coveted habitat to various freshwater fish living within Southern Appalachian streams, such as the native brook trout with which we explored streams in last week’s column. In an effort to lower stream temperatures and erosion, LTLT has developed a program called “Shade Your Stream.” A major focus of the program is to make recommendations to land owners as to which vegetation types are the most beneficial to plant along the stream bank.

If you are interested in learning more about what makes a healthy stream or improving the health of a stream on your land, contact Jason Meador, [email protected] or 828-524-2711 ext. 309, at the Land Trust for the Little Tennessee (LTLT) for information on the Shade Your Stream initiative or to participate in the LTLT’s future rollout of “Grade Your Stream.”

This column is produced by members of the Coweeta Listening Project (CLP), a branch of the Coweeta Long Term Ecological Research Program. Views expressed here are not representative of the USDA Forest Service or the Coweeta Hydrologic Lab. Please share questions, comments, or suggestions for future topics at [email protected] or Coweeta Listening Project, UGA, 210 Field St., Room 204, Athens, GA 30602.

 

From The Franklin Press, April 4, 2014:

We’ve all heard the saying, “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.” The truth behind this well-known phrase is obvious when you visit some of the many streams of the southern Appalachian Mountains, because each person’s idea of beauty determines the state of their land and streams. Do streams that appear “pretty” or “clean” to us also function as “healthy” streams? The answer to that question is a matter of perspective. To gain some perspective, let us consider a “beautiful” stream from the eyes of a fish.

From the viewpoint of a native brook trout, for example, a deep pool in a tributary stream of the Little Tennessee River might provide relief from the summer heat. The stretch of stream this fish calls home was well shaded: trees, bushes, and grass all contribute to keeping the trout’s home cool by providing the same kind of insulation to the waterway that a fisherman’s ice chest supplies to cold beverages. Earlier in his life, the trout might have ventured downstream to hunt for bugs, frogs, and other food, but he could have been forced to turn back after reaching a section of stream with no logs or leaves in the water.

This “clean” stretch of stream would be unwelcoming to a trout, because it provides no hiding places from predators, and the unshaded water is also too warm for the trout’s liking. Warm water doesn’t hold oxygen as well as cooler temperatures, so breathing would be difficult. This lack of creature comforts would be unbearable when coupled with the scarcity of insects and other prey. The trout would not only have been hot and uncomfortable if he stayed, he would have gone hungry.

So, the trout might head back upstream to his home stretch, where there are deep pools to seek shelter and small rapids to frolic in where the water flowed quickly over cobbles and rocks. The trout might have a favorite hiding spot there under an old partially submerged log. That’s where he could have concealed himself from larger fish when he was young and small. Food is abundant in this home stretch of water. Insect larvae could be found among the gravel and mats of leaves that were caught up in fallen branches, and frogs could be snatched from the water’s edge. Further, when the trout found a nice female trout, he knew the gravels in his neighborhood would be attractive to her as she made a nest to lay eggs.

A good home for the trout is also good for other animals, such as native crayfish, stream salamanders, and many insects. The combination of gravel and fallen trees of the streambed serves the trout and his neighbors by providing the resources they need to survive and reproduce. In this natural state, the stream is beautiful to the trout, and rich with life.

While the trout cannot describe what makes his stream beautiful, his presence indicates his appreciation for its features. Natural debris such as fallen logs, leaves, sticks, and large rocks, create the variety of spaces that provide for the diverse needs of wildlife. A stream that looks messy, untidy or in need of a raking to us, is an ideal piece of real estate for a trout.

People can make streams inhospitable to fish and other animals when they landscape their yards with grassy lawns down to the water’s edge. This looks inviting to us and certainly provides a nice spot to watch the stream go by. So, a “healthy” stream may be different from what people see as a “beautiful” or “clean” stream. Yet, our perception of beauty can also be fluid like the stream itself. Many of us like to go fishing, and if we think fishfilled streams are beautiful, we may grow to appreciate the untidy and overgrown streams that fish need.

Many of you act as stewards of the land and water in this region, and it’s up to you to decide how to manage these resources: for your aesthetic values; as critical sources of clean water for the southeast; as the water supply for your home, livestock or irrigation; or as quality wildlife habitat. If you are interested in learning more about caring for your stream, contact Jason Meador, [email protected] or 828-524-2711, ext. 309, at the Land Trust for the Little Tennessee (LTLT) for information on the Shade Your Streams initiative or to participate in the LTLT rollout of the Southern Appalachian Stream Visual Assessment Protocol (saSVAP).

This column is produced by members of the Coweeta Listening Project (CLP), a branch of the Coweeta Long Term Ecological Research Program, [email protected].